View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
1banjo
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: my toy 270mm |
|
|
hey all
I just got my last toy & its not quit what I was thinking it would be!
VINTAGE RODENSTOCK-ROTELER 270 MM f5.6 LENS S#45572xx
AND its a 2LBS 3ozs of glass that was not what my other
RODENSTOCK-ROTELER 270 MM LENS f6.6 is its only 1 lbs 8ozs
the f5.6 needs a 67mm filter where my f6.6 has a 55mm filter
when I bid I did not look at what F stop it was or what F stop the other
was! so that my big Surprise as I was not looking for it to be what I got!!
hey Dan I BooBoo when I got my RODENSTOCK-ROTELER 270 MM LENS f6.6
as it wont go in my Century as its back element dimanter is to big even if I try to put it in from the Graflok back as it still to big! I was thinking that it was off
of a XL that it would have to work on my Century too!! so I never even ask what diminter size the back element was !! BUT it don't
BUT this f5.6 is even biger!
SO Dan whaat 270mm tele works on a Century?/
I just think it time I ask!
banjo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Banjo, the VM says that there are two 270/5.6 Rotelars, one for the XL and one for "9x12" but it gives no details. It doesn't mention an f/6.6 one. As we know, the VM is incomplete and sometimes wrong.
You might be able to use yours by hanging it entirely in front of the lens board. Doing this will probably require a stepped bushing behind it (front end screws into back of lens, rear goes through board, is held in place by a retaining ring). Steve Grimes made one such for my 12"/4 TTH tele.
What to get? I dunno. If I were you I'd break down and buy a copy of the VM and try to understand UK-made tele lenses. Dallmeyer and Ross, mainly, some of theirs turn up in shutters. BTW, I can't figure 'em out but I'm not motivated ...
I'd also visit Schneider's archives at http://www.schneiderkreuznach.com/archiv/archiv.htm to find out more about their teles. Tele-Xenar, Tele-Arton. The VM says Tele-Artons are better. AFAIK Rodenstock has nothing like Schneider's archive.
I'm sorry, but the days of the cheap 12"/4 TTH telephotos seem to be over. See, e.g., http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150741588341 . I sold that lens to Jim, lost money on it, but that was then. Won't do for a Century but is the longest lens that's comfortable on a 2x3 Speed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|