Graflex.org Forum Index Graflex.org
Get help with your Graflex questions here
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Barrel lenses for Pacemaker Speed Graphic 2x3

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Lenses Help
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bozeman



Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Location: Rocky Mountains

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crazy question I suppose but I'm curious about practical usage of a 'barrel type lens' on a Pacemaker Speed Graphic 2x3 (focal plane shutter application). Has any one ever tried such a non leaf shuttered lens with any degree of success? Are there any good thread mount candidates that will actually fit or come close to the 'smallish' 2x3 lens board's shutter hole diameter or (as I assume) does it require a cutting a customized hole? I have seen some relatively small diameter and / or light weight med format SLR lenses from pre WWII KW Pilot, and the Fujica 66 but maybe their lens quality is mediocre at best. Not sure if a 85 to 135mm M39 'slow' lens or a T mount lens from a 35mm camera would even work? Maybe too long & heavy. M42 probably much too large a diameter and again far too heavy? Maybe this concept is only applicable to 4x5 format cameras? Please be kind in your response. I do not have much experience with med format or press type cameras. Maybe the common use of leaf shuttered lenses is the only practical way to go for very good reasons (compact, light weight, proven lens qualities & results).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DenisP



Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 43
Location: Croatia, Europe

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,
Yes, the Speed Graphic in 2x3 size can use barrel lenses, but not those you mentioned (i.e. lenses for 35mm cameras) - the image circle of those just covers 35mm film, and you need a lot more than that

OTOH, medium format camera lenses might give you coverage. Try it and see.

I have some info on my DIY lens hacks here:

http://www.hrtranslations.com/photo/SG_lens.html

It could point you in the right direction.

I have some other results of mating various oddball lenses to my SG 23 here:

http://www.hrtranslations.com/photo/funky/

Feel free to experiment - use cardboard lensboards to temporarily mount various lenses, and check the image on the ground glass - you might find something you like.

Other cheap sources for lenses are old unusable, broken, folder cameras, or even enlarger lenses, or process lenses (like the Repromaster lens on my site...).

Denis

[ This Message was edited by: DenisP on 2006-02-15 02:21 ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Fromm



Joined: 14 May 2001
Posts: 2146
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

On 2006-02-14 21:07, Bozeman wrote:
Crazy question I suppose but I'm curious about practical usage of a 'barrel type lens' on a Pacemaker Speed Graphic 2x3 (focal plane shutter application). Has any one ever tried such a non leaf shuttered lens with any degree of success? Are there any good thread mount candidates that will actually fit or come close to the 'smallish' 2x3 lens board's shutter hole diameter or (as I assume) does it require a cutting a customized hole? I have seen some relatively small diameter and / or light weight med format SLR lenses from pre WWII KW Pilot, and the Fujica 66 but maybe their lens quality is mediocre at best. Not sure if a 85 to 135mm M39 'slow' lens or a T mount lens from a 35mm camera would even work? Maybe too long & heavy. M42 probably much too large a diameter and again far too heavy? Maybe this concept is only applicable to 4x5 format cameras? Please be kind in your response. I do not have much experience with med format or press type cameras. Maybe the common use of leaf shuttered lenses is the only practical way to go for very good reasons (compact, light weight, proven lens qualities & results).
Practical? I think so.

I shoot three ex-aerial camera lenses in barrel on my 2x3 Speed. 1.75"/2.8 Elcan, 4"/2 Taylor Hobson Anastigmat and 12"/4 Taylor Hobson Telephoto. The Elcan was used only on the Vinten F95, both Taylor Hobson lenses were used on the F95 and early Agiflite cameras.

All three lenses were put on board for me by SKGrimes. The Elcan's rear just passes through the camera's front standard. That lens is held to its board by a clamp that goes around its barrel and is held to the board by a screw. The two Taylor Hobsons are too big to pass through the camera's lens throat. Each is held to its board by a threaded bushing that screws into the back of the lens and is held in place by a retaining ring.

I also use process lenses in barrel. But each of them goes into an adapter that holds it and screws into the front of a #1 shutter. Some have the same rear threads. So I have one adapter for each size, not an adapter for each lens.

Front mounting isn't practical with my aerial camera lenses; the Elcan's and 4"/2's back focuses are too short, the 12"/4 would vignette badly. The shortest lens in barrel that I use out-and-about in front of a Copal 1 is a 6"/9 Taylor Hobson, the longest is (long story) a 480/9 Apo-Nikkor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bozeman



Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Location: Rocky Mountains

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the very informative replies. I'll keep my eye open for possible medium format lens candidates. Now I just need to buy a few lens boards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan Fromm



Joined: 14 May 2001
Posts: 2146
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

On 2006-02-15 16:49, Bozeman wrote:
Thanks for the very informative replies. I'll keep my eye open for possible medium format lens candidates. Now I just need to buy a few lens boards.
Unlens you intend to shoot 6x7 or smaller, MF lenses won't do. Lenses for 6x6 and 6x7 can't, in general, cover 6x9. As for example, my 44 Elcan, which doesn't quite cover 6x7; it was made for a camera that shoots 6x6. You should look for lenses made to cover 6x9 or larger.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
troublemaker



Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 715
Location: So Cal

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless of course one is looking for fall off and dark corners with intent for selective cropping. In that case even a 6x6 might not suffice as the sides would do one thing and the tops another, while an old 35mm lens might be just the thing. And there is the other way to go and use 4x5 lenses which work very well on the littel Speeds, like the 135, 127, and many others. I just got a razor sharp late model 135 Xenar which I intend to take in my backpacking kit so I have some movements and no worries about sharp full frame 6x9 color. I think the bottom line is that one can use anything on a Speed so long as it can be focussed the way you want it and it can be mounted. Before going to any mounting trouble, one can simply hold the lens up to the front standard steadying with the hand and view image on the GG and get a good idea what it will do before the necessity of cutting out lens boards.
Have fun...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Lenses Help All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group