View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JBish130
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Eastern US
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, I'm wondering...
Has anyone tried using enlarger lenses on their speed graphics?
What kind of results should I expect?
_________________ Jeff Bishop
"It's light and nothing more." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well since an enlarger lens is optimzed for close focus, it will make a very good macro lens. At infinity, it probably won't be as sharp as a decent 127 ektar or Optar at the same aperture,
but
I'll say what Dr. Rudolf Kingslake told a friend of mine when he asked as specific lens question. "Why don't you try it and find out?"
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2146 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2006-02-06 17:59, JBish130 wrote:
Just out of curiosity, I'm wondering...
Has anyone tried using enlarger lenses on their speed graphics?
What kind of results should I expect?
| Jeff, I've tried a number of enlarging lenses on my 2x3 Speed. None was much good at distance. But and however, people elsewhere have reported getting good results with long (210 mm and up) enlarging lenses.
Take Les' advice. If you have a lens and want to know how well it will do for you, ask it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBish130
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Eastern US
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's what I did. I used a Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 105mm enlarger lens.
I took two shots from on top of my roof.
Not real bad. I can make out bricks in the building next door, thin elements of a distant TV antenna, as well as towers at an antenna farm a couple miles off.
Worthy of further testing.
It's nice to know that my focal plane shutter is dead on (f/8 @ 1/60 and f/16 @ 1/15 perfect exposure). I've never used (or tested) it before.
_________________ Jeff Bishop
"It's light and nothing more." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
troublemaker
Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Posts: 715 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You probably already know this but the Componar is the entry level lens having three of them I can vouch for thier lack of performance. why not try something like the higher quality Componon or Nikkor EL? The difference on the enlarger at least is pretty large in contrast and sharpness.
Try close up like a macro perhaps. I would curious to hear more results as I thought to play around with the lesser Componar myself, and maybe the better ones for tight close ups.
And yes, FPS shutters can be really accurate, I just find I have some camera shake issues when I use them even though I have nice smooth body release mechanisms...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBish130
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 27 Location: Eastern US
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, this particular Schneider is the lowest rated Schneider I've ever crossed paths with.
Bought a 105mm Nikkor EL today on oboy. I'll give it a try sometime next week once it arrives.
Here's the photo with the Schneider if interested:
http://www.nikonians.org/dcforum/DCForumID14/15045.html
_________________ Jeff Bishop
"It's light and nothing more." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
troublemaker
Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Posts: 715 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hard to judge the sharpness of a scan and then on Monitor screen etc..., but the image looks reasonably well done for a near far with a Componar. Take that Nikkor and shoot it at very close, close and sort of close (1,2, 3ft. or whatever your bellows will allow) and see what you get.
I am not sure what that Schneider is supposed to cover ether in the way of negative size, but I would assume it is for entry level 6x7 max, and mine came on a Durst 606 for 6x6 max. I am only keeping them around for who knows why, maybe I will feel like making crappy prints again one day? After I got a new Nikkor EL and Componon-S (both good deals on new old stock in the boxes from dealers) I never looked back. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2146 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2006-02-08 23:05, troublemaker wrote:
Hard to judge the sharpness of a scan and then on Monitor screen etc..., but the image looks reasonably well done for a near far with a Componar. Take that Nikkor and shoot it at very close, close and sort of close (1,2, 3ft. or whatever your bellows will allow) and see what you get.
I am not sure what that Schneider is supposed to cover ether in the way of negative size, but I would assume it is for entry level 6x7 max, and mine came on a Durst 606 for 6x6 max. I am only keeping them around for who knows why, maybe I will feel like making crappy prints again one day? After I got a new Nikkor EL and Componon-S (both good deals on new old stock in the boxes from dealers) I never looked back.
| 105 mm is approximately the normal lens for 2x3, for both taking and enlarging lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|