View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MikeS
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 71 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi All.
I was reading thru the messages, and came across one where somebody mentions that the graflok back off of a Graphic View is the proper size to fit on a Super D (or any of the 4x5 RB's I would imagine). I pulled out my GVII and sure enough, it's the same size as the rotating part of the RB back!
Well, after looking at the RB back some more I realized that it wouldn't be very hard at all to modify it into being a quasi-graflok back (the back on my Super D is one of the later ones with upper & lower sliders, both angled inward a bit, just like normal graflok sliders) without adding any other back to the camera. I come from a manufacturing background, and used to have a full machine shop at my disposal, so I tend to look at some things differently than others, but I think this will work:
If on the graflex back that's currently on the Super D, I were to remove the felt, machine a groove where it's supposed to be, as well as machining off the end that normally fits into the groove on graflex back accessories, then moved the parts that hold the sliders inward a bit (I would either add shims between them and the top/bottom of the back, or just make up new pieces all together) is there any reason that it wouldn't work?
I realize that it won't be a 'true' graflok back in that it wouldn't be able to attach a focusing screen, or slip cut film holders underneath the non-existant focusing screen, but for using grafmatics, roll film holders, Polaroid backs, etc (basically any back you would normally attach with the graflok sliders) is there any reason this won't work?
Has this been done in the past? I have to believe either it has, or I'm missing something, and it won't work, as I find it hard to believe I'm the first person to look at the back and come up with this idea. Any comments would be appreciated.
_________________
-Mike
[ This Message was edited by: MikeS on 2004-08-13 02:07 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
t.r.sanford
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 Location: East Coast (Long Island)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not familiar with the late-model "Graflex" back, but there's no reason that you can't make a workable "Graflok" back, and the method you outline ought to work.
The "Graflex" retaining slide (at least on the older backs I've seen) is straight across, while the "Graflok" sliders have two lobes that retain the accessory. If you have to form new sliders, you can make workable ones from .064-in. brass.
You can form the little hooks that hold the "Graflok" focusing panel in place out of thick brass angle, but you'd have to cut recesses into the rails to accommodate them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MikeS
Joined: 25 Nov 2003 Posts: 71 Location: East Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the reason that the real graflok sliders have 2 parts that come down to hold the back, rather than a single edge like the graflex back has is for clearance for the focusing panel. For my uses, and to simplify the modification I'm not as concerned with fitting the focusing panel onto the back, or being able to use regular cut film holders (the kind that hold 2 sheets of film and slide under the focusing panel), but more interested in being able to use regular 'graflok' type accessories like grafmatics, Polaroid, and roll film backs, all of which would be held by the original sliders.
Part of the reason for wanting to use the original sliders is to keep the back looking as original as possible. One thing I need to look into further is the focusing plane, I want to try and get it matched as closely as possible so the amount of adjustment of the groundglass would be minimal.
Speaking of adjusting the groundglass, I know on the Super D it's adjustable, but is it also adjustable on earlier models as well?
_________________ -Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
t.r.sanford
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 Location: East Coast (Long Island)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you'll never want to use cutfilm holders, there's certainly no reason to accommodate a spring-loaded focusing panel. The logic behind my suggestion for a full modification is that it would allow you to use the "Graflok" focusing panel to adjust the reflex groundglass.
The two "Graflex" reflex models I've examined both have a similar arrangement for adjusting the height of the groundglass. I'd be surprised if any model designed to accept a variety of film and plate holders did not have some means of making this adjustment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bertsaunders
Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 577 Location: Bakersfield California
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|